Road rage is a leading cause of Surrey motor vehicle accidents 604-602-9000. Our Surrey Road Rage Accident Lawyers know many frustrating driving acts happen on our roads daily, drivers cut other drivers off, some drive recklessly and dangerously, some drive too slow or too fast, and increasing traffic can cause tempers to boil over.
MacLean Personal Injury Surrey Road Rage Accident Lawyers are top rated and tenacious and we want to help you get the maximum money settlement when road rage gets you hurt.
Sadly, our Surrey Road Rage Accident Lawyers warn frustrated and emotional drivers often make mistakes in the heat of the moment with tragic results. Not only can road rage lead to a surrey motor vehicle accident, but also heated confrontation between drivers which can get ugly.
Our skilled Surrey Road Rage Accident Lawyers were disappointed to see that CTV News obtained this video from a driver’s dash cam capturing a dangerous moment when a driver attacked another driver who was inside his vehicle, as emotions boiled over during a rainy Vancouver afternoon.
Surrey Road Rage Accident Lawyers Surrey Road Rage Accident Lawyers want you to know Here are 7 tips to help avoid aggressive drivers and road rage that could lead to accident and confrontation.
- Never tailgate other drivers. Tailgating other drivers not only limits your reaction time to traffic, it is also very annoying and frustrating to other drivers on the road.
- Keep a safe distance. Especially if another driver is displaying aggressive behaviour on the road and in his vehicle. There is nothing wrong with taking an exit or pulling over to let a driver go past you if you feel uncomfortable.
- Refrain from any offensive gestures. Many drivers make rude and foul gestures to other drives that only contributes to aggressive and dangerous behaviour from others on the road.
- Allow a driver to pass. Always use the right hand lane if you are moving at a slower speed to allow traffic to pass you if need be. Driving slowly in the left hand lane will frustrate drivers.
- Always use the proper turn signals. It is important to signal properly so you do not catch other drivers off guard.
- Remain calm. Traffic and actions of other drivers can be frustrating at times but it is important not to get angry or emotional and react in a way that can be dangerous to others and your own safety. Driving is not a competition.
- Safety and smarts. Always drive safely on the road and remember that you have a duty to yourself and other drivers safety. Do not cut other drivers off or drive recklessly. If you feel you are in danger or being followed by an aggressive driver, do not be afraid to get help. Do not get out of your vehicle if you do not feel safe. Drive to a populated area or call the police if you feel you are in an uncomfortable position with another driver. Do not drive to your home and get out if you feel you are being followed.
Surrey Road Rage Accident Lawyers Warn Of What Can Happen In Recent Case
In the case of Davies v. Elston, a road rage incident between a motor vehicle driver and a cyclist led to the cyclist suffering a serious pelvis injury. The plaintiff’s son made a loud comment to the plaintiff who was partially deaf, about a parked trucks mirror which was in the bike lane. The truck driver heard this and hopped into his 2011 Ford F350 pickup truck and confronted the cyclists.
Sad Incident Ensued Finding Driver Responsible
Words were exchanged and the truck was close enough to the cyclist that the plaintiff placed his hand on the side of the truck while exchanging words with the driver. The driver drove away which caused the cyclist to fall and fracture his pelvis.
Madam Justice Griffin found the defendant fully responsible and awarded $85,000 in non-pecuniary damages providing the following:
 I find that Jim Davies’ evidence was credible. He was forthright about putting his hand on the truck twice and he did not try to embellish his evidence or evade questions. At no time did he overstate the situation by suggesting that the truck was trying to run into him or that it did run into him. I accept his evidence that Mr. Elston accelerated and pulled away when his hand was still on the truck. Given how close they were, and all that had occurred, it is not surprising that this would startle and produce some physical reaction that would cause even the most experienced cyclist to lose balance.
 As for whether Mr. Elston’s conduct was negligent, I find that the defendant fell below the standard of care of a reasonable and prudent driver, in driving alongside the two cyclists and yelling at them, while so close to the bike lane that it made it intimidating, threatening and unsafe for the cyclists; and then in addition in pulling away quickly, without warning, with Mr. Davies so close by and with his hand on the truck.
 It is obvious as a matter of common sense that such driving conduct was without reasonable care for the safety of the cyclists and was negligent.
 No matter how aggravating a cyclist’s behaviour might be, and I find there was nothing aggravating about the Davies’ conduct, a driver of a motor vehicle can never be justified in deliberately using a motor vehicle to confront a cyclist who is riding a bike. Confrontation creates a serious risk of harm to the cyclist which is way out of proportion to anything the cyclist might have done. A driver of a motor vehicle is not entitled to impose a penalty of death or serious bodily harm on a cyclist just because the cyclist was rude or broke a traffic rule.
 It has to be remembered that motor vehicles have four wheels, automatic brakes, seatbelts, and the driver is nicely encased in a heavy steel cage and that a person on a bicycle is not in a situation which is the least bit comparable, even if going the same speed as a vehicle. A cyclist cannot stop on a dime, is vulnerable to losing balance, and can be seriously injured or killed if he or she makes contact with a motor vehicle or falls at a high speed.
 Mr. Elston and Jim Davies knew this at the time that Mr. Elston was confronting Jim Davies. This is what made the situation so unnerving for Jim Davies and this was entirely foreseeable to Mr. Elston who wished to intimidate him.
 I conclude that but for Mr. Elston’s aggressive and negligent conduct, Jim Davies would not have fallen from his bike. Mr. Elston’s negligence therefore caused the accident and resultant injuries.
 Based on the seriousness of Mr. Davies’ injuries, the numerous medical treatments he has undergone, the pain he has suffered and will continue to suffer, and the diminishment in enjoyment of the activities he used to love to do, but keeping in mind the relative nature of non-pecuniary damages and the rough upper limit for the most catastrophic of injuries, I find that $85,000 is an appropriate award of non-pecuniary damages on the facts of this case.